John Chrysostom

"And what shall I more say? For the time would fail me to tell." After this he no longer puts down the names: but having ended with an harlot, and put them to shame by the quality of the person, he no longer enlarges on the histories, lest he should be thought tedious. However he does not set them aside, but runs over them, doing both very judiciously, avoiding satiety, and not spoiling the closeness of arrangement; he was neither altogether silent, nor did he speak so as to annoy; for he effects both points. …

Homily on Hebrews 27 ↗

Theophylact of Ohrid

Having brought the discourse to the harlot and sufficiently shaming them by the character of this person, he then for the sake of brevity does not enumerate all of them individually, so as not to appear lacking in propriety; yet neither does he remain entirely silent, but while seemingly concluding his discourse, he does not leave the matter unattended. And in this way, he neither wearies the listener, nor does he teach any less effectively what he intends, through the enumeration of a great number of persons. What sort? …

Commentary on Hebrews ↗

Oecumenius

"of Gideon." What kind Gideon was. "of David." As for what David was, in that he was established on his throne, according to the literal sense indeed Solomon, but according to the spiritual understanding, Solomon, the spiritual Lord Jesus.

The Pseudo-Oecumenian Catena on Hebrews ↗

Thomas Aquinas

627. – Having described the things done through faith by the fathers before and during the very entry into the promised land, the Apostle now begins to give examples of those who were in the promised land. But because there were so many, he recites their deeds in a general way and, after giving the names of the fathers, he tells why he must be brief. In regard to this he does three things: first, he gives the names of the fathers and the reason why he passes over their deeds quickly; secondly, he shows what they did by faith (v. …

Commentary on Hebrews ↗