Loading…
VRSZ
This sets the art on your cards and whose commentary you read on each verse. You can change it later in settings.
Translation
Loading…
What the Fathers say
Eastern Fathers
John Chrysostom
Then he states also a cause, as one discoursing with those who are free: a thing which in many places I have remarked. What then is the cause? "For a man indeed ought not to have his head veiled, forasmuch as he is the image and glory of God." This is again another cause. "Not only," so he speaks, "because he hath Christ to be His Head ought he not to cover the head, but because also he rules over the woman." For the ruler when he comes before the king ought to have the symbol of his rule. …
Theophylact of Ohrid
The first reason he put forward was that the man has Christ as his head, and therefore should not be covered. Now he presents another reason as well, that he is "the glory of God," that is, God's representative and His image. Therefore the representative of the authority of the King of all must appear before Him with the signs of this authority, that is, with an uncovered head. For it serves as a sign that the man is not subject to anyone on earth, but himself rules over all, as the image of God. …
Methodius of Olympus
And he asks what will be the appearance of the risen body, when this human form, as according to him useless, shall wholly disappear; since it is the most lovely of all things which are combined in living creatures, as being the form which the Deity Himself employs, as the most wise Paul explains: "For a man indeed ought not to cover his head, forasmuch as he is the image and glory of God; "
Western Saints
Thomas Aquinas
Then when he says, For a man, he presents the second proof, which is taken from a comparison to God. First, he induces to the proof; secondly, he proves what he had supposed (v. 8). In regard to the first he does two things: first, he lays down the reason for that which is on man's part; secondly, on the woman's part (v. 7). …
Translation